Pulling strings for the Bridge of Strings

by harry    April 30 2008
Bridge of StringsMunicipal newsPhotography
Construction on the Bridge of Strings at the entrance to Jerusalem is almost complete and will be dedicated on June 26 in honor of Israel's 60th anniversary. Designed by famed Spanish architect Santiago Calatrava, the construction of the bridge has not been without controversy. Outrageous traffic jams, increasing costs and even cracks (yes, cracks) in the bridge and other problems have made for a PR nightmare for the municipality. Many feel that the bridge is simply out of its element and question whether it even fits visually in the city. Others think that Jerusalem, a city not exactly known for anything progressive nor enough spending on welfare or cultural initiatives, is deserving of such a unique landmark. Design-wise, the goal of the bridge was to add a defining visual element to the "skyline" of the entrance of Jerusalem, which, up until now included dilapidated buildings and that's about it.

Besides being an architectural wonder, the bridge's purpose is to carry the Jerusalem light rail, which is currently more than a year behind even the most updated schedules.

Without thinking about all the problems that have plagued the construction, the Bridge of Strings (some say Chords) is a marvel, and it is impossible to stand under it and not be in awe.

Santiago Calatrava's Bridge of Strings in Jerusalem

Santiago Calatrava's Bridge of Strings in Jerusalem

chords bridge today 1 by harry.JPG

chords bridge today 5 by harry.JPG

chords bridge today 3 by harry.JPG

 Photographs by Harry Rubenstein for Jerusalemite.

Comments (9)    Email to a friend    Link

Related Jerusalemite Content

Web 2.0: Add to del.icio.us    Technorati    Digg this!
Comments (1-9 of 9)
Comments by yoyoshashada: Harrison, you are amazing... those are some really great shots! I'd venture to guess that you may go down in the record books as one of the first to photograph this amazing marval... really amazing shots!!!
Yochai :-)
Comments by hallel: Nice photos - I for one think it's a great addition for our city. There's plenty to complain about it (it would be nice if a fraction of that budget were spent on cleaning up the city), but it's strikingly beautiful in my opinion.
Comments by greg: It's nice to look at for a second, but most of those I know who look out their window and sees it everyday are not at all pleased with the new skyline.

Nice shots, though.
Comments by Josh: Having just returned from 7 weeks in Jerusalem, I saw the bridge quite a few times, and it came up in conversation more than once. I think it is an intriguing design and fairly visually appealing, but part of me wonders why it was even necessary to suspend this bridge. Plus, just about every permanent Jerusalem resident I know pointed out the the vertical portion of the bridge seems to be a rather large middle finger, and its pointing at the city.....
Comments by harry: Ha! It does look like a middle finger....I'll never look at it the same again!
Comments by Alan: We need a new symbol for the city that isn't (1) 3-freaking-thousand years old or (2) so disputed no one can look at it without turning purple in the face (i.e. - the Dome of the Rock). It is the 21st century after all.

They hated the Eiffel Tower in the beginning, too: (From Wikipedia): The tower was met with much criticism from the public when it was built, with many calling it an eyesore. (Novelist Guy de Maupassant — who claimed to hate the tower — supposedly ate lunch in the Tower's restaurant every day. When asked why, he answered that it was the one place in Paris where you couldn't see the Tower.) Today, it is widely considered to be a striking piece of structural art.
Comments by Benji: Wow-Harry, you took those? Nice shots.
Comments by alistaircw: Harry, is it OK to use one of your photos to use on the away.com travel blog (http://blogs.away.com/travel_guide)? We're hosting this week's Carnival of Cities and will be including a link to this post. Thanks. You can email me at awearmouth@away.com.
Comments by ofer s: this bridge is simply not preaty! he does not feet too the rest of the city and does not relate to his serounding. maybe if he was in a different color or maybe even covered with jerusalem's famous stones then it would have been more beautiful.
but, like every thing new... we dont like it now, but after we get used to it we will thing that it is beautiful. at least i hope so...
we just need a litle time to get used to it... because it is already there and there is nothing we can do about it.
You need to be logged in to be able to comment!
Blog Quick Navigation
   
 
Login
New User
I forgot my password
Jerusalemite Newsletter
Sign me up for the Jerusalemite Newsletter
Tell me more

Jerusalem Weather

Elsewhere on Jerusalemite

Jerusalem museums

Elsewhere on Jerusalemite

Jerusalem restaurants

Elsewhere on Jerusalemite

Kids' events

Elsewhere on Jerusalemite

Jerusalem events

Elsewhere on Jerusalemite

Taking place this week

Blog  /  Events  /  Guide  /  Maps  /  My Jerusalemite  /  Advertise  /  About Us  /  Press Center  /  Contact  /  © Jerusalemite  /  Privacy Policy